Jonesieblog - Latest Comments in What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

jonesieboy — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:49:09 -0000

Teachers certainly need to keep their critical faculties switched on! By "interactive software provided with the board" do you mean the flipchart software? I use it all the time - it can be as unobtrusive or as all-singing-all-dancing as you choose to make it.

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

Russell Harpham — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:01:36 -0000

I have just stumbled across this site and I must say that I am very interested to read your comments about the Interactive Whiteboard and its integration into the classroom. You bring up some important points that do highlight the need for greater enthusiasm by the teacher in some cases.

However, I think a more interesting angle is that teachers have been hoodwinked by the commercial world to think that all of their teaching must be driven by the whiteboard and its software. The truth of the matter is that a whiteboard is a peripheral to the pc and the mac and allows the teacher not to be stuck behind their monitor. In terms of what they teach, well they should use as little or as much of the applications and online resources available to the school. I would always recomend a teacher to refrain from using the interactive software provided with the board as it often confuses and distracts.

I better stop now, will post again I'm sure

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

Liz O'Neill — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:46:36 -0000

Jonesie,

No sweat. I'll continue drawing dingbats onto the IWB.

Sad really...

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

jonesieboy — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 03:02:04 -0000

Sorry Liz - didn't get those links yet, but I'm still on the case!

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

jonesieboy — Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:47:53 -0000

Ah.... me and my big mouth. I just realised that you are an English teacher, not a Maths teacher. Fear not, I'll come up with some links by tomorrow evening :)

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

Liz O'Neill — Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:41:31 -0000

Not sure...

What do you suggest? I can always try!

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

jonesieboy — Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:22:37 -0000

Does your authority use websense for filtering Liz? If so, I reckon I can find some cool interactive stuff that sneaks through.

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

Liz O'Neill — Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:19:44 -0000

I'd love to use some games -seems like anything like that, which is interactive is blocked by the filter as 'games' or 'fun'!

The copying from the board issue: I use it as a way of making kids think about stuff -and for older pupils as notes for study. But I'm aware that it isn't the best pedagogical approach. I do try to add in highlighting, suggest they annotate as I have done -or mind map the information. Much better if they have ownership -but not always practical.

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

jonesieboy — Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:07:20 -0000

Great game! It could take over from line rider!

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

Dan Stucke — Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:53:12 -0000

Thanks in advance!

One great thing I find they are useful for is playing games, both specific mathematical games in the context of a lesson. But also slightly less educationally relevant games as a reward for a hard week's work!

Our current class favourite is stick remover:

http://ishi.blog2.fc2.com/blog-entry-206.html

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

jonesieboy — Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:39:00 -0000

Thanks Dan. I have an idea for your training sessions - I'll put it in a comment on your post.

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

jonesieboy — Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:37:38 -0000

Thanks Liz. So all the things they didn't like were aspects of the way you used the board as a presentation tool? Interesting. It's reasuring for me to hear that they are not impressed by presentational whistles and bells, as I don't bother much with that kind of stuff.

I think it's definitely important to get the board pen into the hands of the pupils as often as possible - they all seem to enjoy using the boards themselves.

The issue of copying from the board is occupying my thoughts at the moment. Why am I asking my pupils to copy down notes from the board if I can just print them out or stick them on-line in a matter of clicks? What is the point? I'm not saying there's no point - i remember myself having to drop out of a final year complex analysis course because the lecturer gave us print-outs of the notes. Without the physical act of copying out what he was showing us, I completely lost the thread of what was going on! Maybe that was just because I had been so conditioned by years of traditional education. I wonder how our pupils would feel about it? Perhaps I should ask them!

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

Liz O'Neill — Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:16:15 -0000

They didn’t like the animations I had tried to add – little men, tick boxes etc. They didn’t like the added sounds of a typewriter or a crashing noise, when something happened, ‘irritating’. Didn’t like powerpoints with too many words – thought they gave them headaches.
Some of the stuff was my fault –they weren’t crazy about having to copy down from the whiteboard – we discussed this and it came out that they would have felt the same about copying from an ordinary board.

They liked images and things changing on the board but not quite as much as I had expected. Some of them even said they preferred ‘basic’ over ‘fancy’ –I got the impression that this was more to do with a general feeling that they didn’t like having their expectations raised that something was going to be more exciting than it turned out. Some pupils hated having to wait for people who were slower at reading stuff or who wanted to look at images longer (and vice versa).

They liked the idea of getting to ‘work’ the board – giving a presentation or talk using it. And they loved getting to see films on a big screen…

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

Dan Stucke — Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:04:43 -0000

Hi,

I think you summed up exactly what I was trying to say much more eloquently than I did!

Dan

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

jonesieboy — Sun, 04 Feb 2007 17:17:22 -0000

What did your pupils say Liz? What did they like and not like?

Re: What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

Liz O'Neill — Sun, 04 Feb 2007 10:57:55 -0000

Thanks for posting about this. I've been thinking about my use of the IWB for a while, and wondering what might take me further forward with it.

I use my IWB every day putting up lesson objectives etc. I've tried to use it as more than a big screen for my laptop, with film clips, and very basic animation.

I've polled pupils on my use of IWB and got some quite helpful feedback. I was struck by how little they rated the aspects of it I thought they would most like.

My one concern is that it does seem to (as the report mentions) suit the more didactic style of teaching. I've seen demonstrations (on Teachers TV for example) where pupils get to come up to the board and write on it themselves. My lot don’t get quite so enthusiastic about it.

I'd be interested to hear how other teachers use IWB to engender a more collaborative style of learning.