<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jonesieblog - Latest Comments in More Microsoft FUD.. sigh!</title><link>http://jonesieboy.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://jonesieboy.disqus.com/more_microsoft_fud_sigh/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:40:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: More Microsoft FUD.. sigh!</title><link>http://www.jonesieboy.co.uk/blog/2007/05/16/more-microsoft-fud-sigh/#comment-9135828</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good post, Robert - FUD is what it is all about. I hope no one out there chooses to take it too seriously.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Connell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:40:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Microsoft FUD.. sigh!</title><link>http://www.jonesieboy.co.uk/blog/2007/05/16/more-microsoft-fud-sigh/#comment-2267980</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely!  Microsoft can only lose here - its customers now have choices, and they are making a big mistake by feeding the perception that Microsoft are the bad guys.  Who wants to run a computer with an OS owned by bad guys?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jonesieboy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 12:06:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Microsoft FUD.. sigh!</title><link>http://www.jonesieboy.co.uk/blog/2007/05/16/more-microsoft-fud-sigh/#comment-2267979</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember being similarly saddened at some point in the last year when I read about Blackboard 'patenting' the LMS in the US - long live open source!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AB</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:34:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>